DeepCool (GamerStorm) PN-M

1000/1200W

GoldATXATX 3.xFull modular2024

B-Published tier

2 known revisions of this model

Manufacturers revise a platform without changing the model name. Each row below is a distinct revision with its own rating.

Why this rating

Every criterion, its status, and the evidence behind it.

B-Published rating

D+Engine rating

Evidence

84%Well evidenced

PASS: 10
WARN: 0
FAIL: 1
N/D: 11

Ratings disagree by 4 steps

The engine rates this unit lower than the imported list, driven by the criteria listed below.

Architecture

PASS
Resonant primary stage (LLC)weight 3
PASS
Synchronous rectificationweight 2
PASS
Independent DC-DC converters for +5V and +3.3Vweight 3
N/D
PFC type is not documented; APFC assumed only when statedweight 2

Standards

PASS
Declares ATX 3.x complianceweight 2
PASS
Full-range input (~100-240 VAC)weight 2

Efficiency

PASS
Gold class efficiencyweight 2

Components

N/D
Capacitor temperature rating is not documentedweight 2
N/D
Fan bearing type is not documentedweight 1.5

Protections

N/D
Protection set has not been verified independentlyweight 3
N/D
OCP declaration has not been verifiedweight 2
N/D
OTP declaration has not been verifiedweight 1.5
FAIL
Protection trip points are set poorly (OCP is set way too high on the minor rails, which led to failure of the unit during Aris testing.)weight 2
OCP is set way too high on the minor rails, which led to failure of the unit during Aris testing.(editorial note)

Electrical performance

N/D
No qualitative electrical assessment on recordweight 3
N/D
No ripple measurement on recordweight 3
N/D
No voltage regulation measurement on recordweight 2
N/D
No transient response measurement on recordweight 2

Evidence

PASS
Built by CWTweight 1.5
PASS
Platform CSZ costdownweight 1.5
PASS
Independent testing on record (OCP is set way too high on the minor rails, which led to failure of the unit during Aris testing.)weight 2
OCP is set way too high on the minor rails, which led to failure of the unit during Aris testing.(editorial note)

Warranty and support

N/D
Warranty length is not documentedweight 1.5

Safety

PASS
No safety incidents or false claims on recordweight 3

How the tier was reached

MISSED
Tier A - reference classspec 12.9
- — Protection trip points: Protection trip points are set poorly (OCP is set way too high on the minor rails, which led to failure of the unit during Aris testing.)
- — Too many failed criteria for this tier (1)
MISSED
Tier B - strong mainstreamspec 12.10
- — Protection trip points: Protection trip points are set poorly (OCP is set way too high on the minor rails, which led to failure of the unit during Aris testing.)
- — Too many failed criteria for this tier (1)
MISSED
Tier C - adequatespec 12.11
- — Protection trip points: Protection trip points are set poorly (OCP is set way too high on the minor rails, which led to failure of the unit during Aris testing.)
- — Too many failed criteria for this tier (1)
MET
Tier D - basicspec 12.12

Weighted pass ratio 92% with no warnings

Missing evidence

These criteria could not be resolved. They lower the confidence index rather than count against the unit.

Active power factor correction
Electrolytic capacitor temperature rating
Fan bearing type
Protection coverage
Over-current protection declared
Over-temperature protection declared
Measured electrical behaviour
+12V ripple
Voltage regulation
+12V transient response
Manufacturer warranty

Specification

Values carry the source they came from; unknowns stay unknown.

Capacities: 1000 W1200 W
Form factor: ATX
ATX generation: ATX 3.x
Efficiency class: Gold
AC input: Full range (~100–240 V)
Cable modularity: Full
Introduced: 2024

Electrical architecture

What is actually inside, when it is known.

Primary stage: LLC
Secondary rectification: SR
Minor rail regulation: DC-DC
Built by: CWT
Platform: CSZ costdown

Reviewer notes

Free text from the source, used by the engine as signals.

OCP is set way too high on the minor rails, which led to failure of the unit during Aris testing. Detier to B- unless verified fixed

Protection trip points criticisednoconfidence 60%
Independent laboratory testing referencedyesconfidence 60%

Where this data comes from

Each field records which source supplied it and how sure we are.

Field	Source	Confidence	Captured
oem	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import
intro_year	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import
modularity	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import
atx_version	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import
form_factor	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import
input_range	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import
platform	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import
editorial_tier	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import
efficiency_class	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import
primary_topology	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import
minor_rail_regulation	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import
secondary_rectification	PSU Tier List (seed workbook)trust 70	70%	workbook import

Primary source: PSU Tier List (seed workbook) (row 482). Community-maintained tier list imported as the seed data set. Ratings from this source are shown as the published tier; the Tier Engine computes its own rating separately.